<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSBA: Evaluating Digital Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosavvy.org/2005/10/26/nsba-evaluating-digital-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosavvy.org/2005/10/26/nsba-evaluating-digital-products/</link>
	<description>Great teaching and learning with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:47:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernajean Porter</title>
		<link>http://technosavvy.org/2005/10/26/nsba-evaluating-digital-products/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernajean Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosavvy.org/?p=318#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>Cindy - absolutely.  the review did not include the idea that 50% of the grade would be the craftsmanship of the communication.  This is where the technical elements are assessed in context with the content.  Did the elements used decorate - illustrate or illuminate the message?  There are six elements within the craftsmanship - see my website for details of items to assess regardless of the type of technology used.  Bernajean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy &#8211; absolutely.  the review did not include the idea that 50% of the grade would be the craftsmanship of the communication.  This is where the technical elements are assessed in context with the content.  Did the elements used decorate &#8211; illustrate or illuminate the message?  There are six elements within the craftsmanship &#8211; see my website for details of items to assess regardless of the type of technology used.  Bernajean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Grabe</title>
		<link>http://technosavvy.org/2005/10/26/nsba-evaluating-digital-products/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Grabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosavvy.org/?p=318#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Tim,
So appreciate your blogging the conference. I so agree the content is paramount when assessing digital projects. However, I do think we need to include comment on the &quot;grammar&quot; of digital projects - navigation- media&#039;s ability to enhance the communication of the content, easily read text, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
So appreciate your blogging the conference. I so agree the content is paramount when assessing digital projects. However, I do think we need to include comment on the &#8220;grammar&#8221; of digital projects &#8211; navigation- media&#8217;s ability to enhance the communication of the content, easily read text, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
